Diskussion:T EN: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Zur Navigation springen
Zur Suche springen
| Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
| + | [11] |
||
| − | == Exceptions == |
+ | == Exceptions == |
| − | [ |
+ | [13] |
| − | + | Perhaps it would be useful to list the exception provision in a paragraph 2? User146 (discussion) 10:52, 22 May 2022 (CEST) |
|
| + | |||
| − | [ |
+ | [19] |
| − | [15] I agree, although it is not clear to me whether the sentence with the exceptions already constitutes a new paragraph or whether this is a new paragraph. In any case, one would have to determine where the exceptions are regulated with a reference or regulate in the article itself as paragraph 2, which these are.User117 (discussion) 09:06, 16 May 2022 (CEST) |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | [16] |
||
| − | [17] I agree that the exception provision needs to be in a second paragraph. In addition, I find the sentence order "Exceptions may be granted" a bit unattractive. Better: "Exceptions may be granted" ("it" does not need it). Further, I also think that it needs to be more specific as to when exceptions are granted. The problem right now is that no one really knows exactly when the provision applies now, because for some reason an exception could be granted. So I would suggest that we say, for example, "exceptions can be granted for reasons of public interest". What do you guys think? "User129 (discussion) 14:54, 19 May 2022 (CEST)" |
||
| − | [18] |
||
| ⚫ | |||
Version vom 8. Februar 2023, 10:05 Uhr
[11]
Exceptions
[13] Perhaps it would be useful to list the exception provision in a paragraph 2? User146 (discussion) 10:52, 22 May 2022 (CEST)
[19]
- you could also refer to BV 10a III. There the exceptions of "security, climatic conditions and native customs" are mentioned. User159 (discussion) 10:58, 16 May 2022 (CEST).